| ▲ | andsoitis 2 hours ago | |||||||
Let’s assume the analogy to town square holds, who do you think should control it? The UN? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Avicebron 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I'm reminded of the phrase 天下为公, which is hard to translate exactly because 公 is doing some linguistical juggling that English has a hard time matching. I don't think twitter in its current capacity should exist, the storage should be decoupled from the filters and the filters that everyone uses should be a free market with traditional competition dynamics. It may end up looking something like twitter, but without editorializing algorithms and a single walled entry. We can quibble who owns the database I suppose. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | righthand an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It was only a “town square” in the minds of Twitter users, no one else thinks that about a news media propped-up social network. If anything it was a comment section attached to nothing. And comment sections all get bad after a while. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Muromec 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
the EU of course, the actually functioning UN | ||||||||