| ▲ | kristopolous 4 hours ago |
| If you look at "old" internet: fidonet telnet bitnet ftp fsp wais netnews whois++ gopher relaynet ... i mean irc is one of the only ones that is still used, and mostly as it was 35 years ago. Pretty impressive. People love knocking on IRC but people are still on it, still using it... |
|
| ▲ | frumiousirc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| HTTP is also still somewhat popular. But, seriously, that got me curious. There are many protocols from that early era that are still with us today. NTP, DNS, SMTP, IMAP, BGP, SNMP, NFS, ICMP. If you allow the 1990's as counting as "old" we can add SSH and SSL, DHCP, LDAP. |
| |
| ▲ | Geezus_42 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I feel the need to be pedantic, but I do not mean it to be rude. What we sometimes call SSL is not the same SSL as back then. That said, TLS was released in 1999, so it just barely makes the cut. :D | |
| ▲ | fragmede 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | TCP |
|
|
| ▲ | countWSS 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Actually, its just inertia and lack of reliable forum hosting,
the actual "killer app" that replaced volatile and unarchivable
chat content, but no one learned from it and people flocked to Discord,
which is even more hostile to archiving/scanning chat history. |
| |
| ▲ | Ekaros 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I am starting to wonder is archiving or scanning history even possible with how hostile internet has become. Especially when so many tech companies will scan and download same content countless times without single care of damage or cost the cause... Just imagine hosting that history on your instance for users and then some vibecoder without care in his work starts scanning it automatically every 5 seconds just in case it might have changed... |
|
|
| ▲ | jstummbillig 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Everything decentralized will keep being used. Stuff is sticky. More illuminating: To what (relative) extend? And what's the trajectory? Looking at Google Trends: https://trends.google.com/explore?q=%2Fm%2F03t2s%2C%2Fg%2F11... |
|
| ▲ | techjamie an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There is still a niche community of people running Gopher servers. I wrote a small basic implementation of a Gopher server in Python before for fun once and it hosted a Gopher hole for a few years. I doubt even one person actually looked it at besides me, but the RFC is simple and can be implemented pretty fast. |
|
| ▲ | terminalbraid 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, but the major upgrades for things like telnet and ftp were adding appropriate encryption layers and improved authentication to include things like certificates. IRC shoehorned those into the connections awkwardly but it's still not often mandatory and registration is painful. Also usenet is still very popular but mostly used for file sharing. |
| |
| ▲ | kristopolous 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes. usenet, however, used to be social media. It was like text-only reddit. | | |
| ▲ | hollowonepl 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don’t believe it was or continually is limited to text only, but I do believe we had netiquette back then which helped to reconsider spamming internet with media and other decorators, only to have it all forgotten 72h later | |
| ▲ | cowlevel 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Still is, but a bit empty. https://eternal-september.org/ |
| |
| ▲ | movsx 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What about the registration you find so painful? It takes a single command to register a nick, if that's what you mean. | | |
| ▲ | dijit 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | In his defence, its a single command, if you know the command | | |
| ▲ | terminalbraid 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | This, which is not uniform across servers, and has more work if you want to do certificate-based auth. Additionally getting a nick cloak is good opsec and also extremely not uniform. | | |
| ▲ | itintheory 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The entire premise of cloaks as optional seems like broken UX to me. I'd like to see a new version make your connections details private by default. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | zoky 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| FTP is still used quite a bit. For what it’s useful for, nothing has come close to replacing it. |
| |
| ▲ | cowlevel 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | SFTP? Don't confuse it with FTP or FTPS - SFTP is a different protocol which runs on top of SSH. | | |
| ▲ | Bender 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | They are not confused. A lot of companies still use FTP internally and for B2B. Many people would be very uncomfortable if they knew how much companies including banks, payment systems, etc... and governments still depended on FTP and clear text authentication. That's even before broaching the subject of which of the applications and daemons in use are being actively maintained. |
| |
| ▲ | networked 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What do you mean, "for what it’s useful for"? For me, WebDAV has replaced FTP where SFTP hasn't. | |
| ▲ | kristopolous 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | like in enterprise? the browsers stopped shipping with ftp support I think 5 years ago. | | |
| ▲ | terminalbraid 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You might be surprised to learn there are dedicated ftp clients. | | | |
| ▲ | zoky 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hosting files to be downloaded via web browser isn’t what it’s useful for. If you’re going to do that, you might as well use… a web server. FTP is useful for bidirectional file exchange over the Internet. There are other protocols, but they all have drawbacks. SFTP can be used for similar functionality, but it requires users to have SSH access. SMB and NFS don’t really work so well over the Internet and are a pain to configure for multiple users. For setting up accounts dedicated to transferring files, you really can’t beat FTP (or really FTPS, which is just FTP over SSL). |
| |
| ▲ | charcircuit 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | HTTPS has largely replaced it. Pretty much all files uploaded or downloaded from the internet is going to be done via HTTPS and not FTP. | | |
| ▲ | mathgeek 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Only if you ignore the banking industry. | | |
| ▲ | thiht 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Fair point, but I would assume the AWS S3 by itself is bigger than the FTP/SFTP traffic globally including banks. No idea if it’s true, and I’m not sure we can get reliable stats on this |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | nmlt 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| But as IRC has a social network component, it's more of a social thing than anything inherent to IRC. |
|
| ▲ | unclet 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| what about SMTP? |
| |
| ▲ | kristopolous 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I thought of that ... you could put it in the list but I wouldn't unless you're talking cron. I mean when I started it was like mail bob@froggy.ucla.edu and bob would open up pine or emacs and not get any spam or have to do anything crazy and we'd have a conversation. that modality is long dead. we still have email but it's not that same ... I however could take mirc from like 1995 and still use everything. |
|
|
| ▲ | RyJones 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm here looking for other telenet (not telnet) oldheads, finding nobody. |
|
| ▲ | dist-epoch 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| COBOL is still used 50 years later. |
| |
