| ▲ | ButlerianJihad a day ago | |||||||
I am unsure if this is a common mindset for Americans, but I personally perceived Europe as rather backward and out-of-date, technologically. I don't know why I got that idea, other than "Europe is more ancient than us" and believing that USA is the nexus and origin of all innovation. So, when I arrived in Barcelona and Catalonia, I was pleasantly, mildly surprised that not only had Europe kept pace with us techno-mages in America, but they had some kind of parallel evolution going on, in terms of connectors, interfaces, protocols, etc. My fiancée was sort of mystified, because my favorite subject of photography was not landmarks or her pretty face, but the circuit breaker box, the rear of her television set, the A/C unit, and any other cool, distinctly Euro-tech instances I could identify around there. I tried helping her adjust/fix her aerial TV antenna, got zapped a few times; discovered that Catalonian TV antennas are energized with a few volts for whatever reason; decided that Euro-tech is beyond my expertise to tinker with on someone else's behalf, especially a native family. Thankfully, I didn't have any portable electronics or appliances in my luggage that needed adapters or plugs, but the experience was truly humbling, and eye-opening, and I returned to the United States with a better calibrated worldview. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dguest 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The US is innovative but can't be bothered to get the boring stuff right. Meanwhile Europe standardized bank transfers with IBAN, killed connector type proliferation with by standardizing on USB-C, and routed 3-phase power most homes. Oh, and the metric system. And while Europe has a wide range of cultures and functionality of government, a lot of places have simpler tax forms and a more prescriptive legal system (as opposed to the precedent-dominated Common Law tradition in the US). The German-speaking countries even rewrote spelling to make it simpler. I view a lot of this stuff as infrastructure investment. We shouldn't have to stumble over the mundane to do interesting things. As others have commented, Europe also had the advantage of adopting some technologies later, but in some cases they just seem to be more aligned with a system of constant (if sometimes frustratingly slow) improvement. | ||||||||
| ▲ | mschuster91 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As for the TV antenna, centralized European installations tend to have really long cable runs, even more so for cable TV, and there's a wideband PA in the basement. | ||||||||
| ▲ | adventured 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The US technology advantage is in software, hardware, biotech/pharma, AI, some advanced robotics (China is leading in general robotics), quantum, aerospace, military, medtech. Competitively the US does well in energy tech and agriculture tech. The US is #2 in wind power, #2 in solar power, #1 in nuclear power, along with being the world's biggest oil & natural gas producer. The US industrial rail system is also an epic scale marvel, while its consumer rail system is pathetic. It's definitely not elite in most infrastructure (including electrical plugs). | ||||||||
| ||||||||