| ▲ | 3eb7988a1663 2 hours ago | |||||||
Can I use this as a generic app permissions boundary or do I have to somehow fake it as an "agent"? We are well past the point where I need to be able to lock down that my music player has no ability to read my SSH keys or whatever. Naturally, this will be gated to corporate customers - the plebs do not get access to better security unless they pay for a top tier license. | ||||||||
| ▲ | tomrod 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
FANTASTIC question here. I've been locking down agents by running them as untrusted users (mostly linux here) as even docker boundaries aren't really great. Firecracker is a step in the right direction (older tech, sure, but useful). I really want a local hashicorp-like vault that I can give agents specific access permissions and it can take forever to review and manage those access boundaries. | ||||||||
| ▲ | tuwtuwtuwtuw 22 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
There are many things that would be good to lock down. NPM install comes to mind. I wonder if I will be able to integrate this with dev containers somehow, so my dev container could run in stricter isolation. | ||||||||
| ||||||||