Have you settled on a BitWarden alternative, or a short list you’re considering?

birksherty an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Proton Pass. I stopped using Bitwarden for a different reason, the mobile app was too slow when not connected to internet. I can't accept such slowness, the company will definitely give justifications for this. But I don't care, let me see my passwords or notes for a website immediately. Proton Pass is better in this regard.

▲

doodlesdev an hour ago | parent [-]

Proton Pass cannot be self-hosted.

▲

sliken 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

As as self-hoster, I recommend vault warden. Supports 2fa, written in rust, works pretty well, is easy to backup, and you can use bitwarden's phone client.

I'm curious why other self hosters think it's a bad idea.

▲

missmewiththatl an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

As a self-hoster, I don't think password managers should be self-hosted.

▲

tappio 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I don't see much reason not to self-host a properly built password manager like Vaultwarden or something similar? The clients keep a local encrypted copy of the vault, so the server only needs to be up for syncing. If it went down for a week, you probably wouldn't even notice unless you were saving new logins. And even if the server got hacked, everything on it is encrypted. Why do you think it should not be selfhosted?

▲

Oxodao an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

On the contrary. If there's one thing you should self-host is definetly password manager.

▲

jazzyjackson 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can’t relate. If you’re worried about you’re own reliability to keep it online, just keep paper backups

▲

cortesoft an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

What? Why not?

	▲	torzer321 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		password managers should not involve hosting at all, use something file-local, keepass(xc) or alike

▲

an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]