| ▲ | alecst 2 hours ago |
| If my dog bites you, you can say it bit you, or that I let it bite you, but those things can both be true. |
|
| ▲ | nvme0n1p1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Dogs are alive. AIs are not alive. |
| |
| ▲ | Freedom2 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Perhaps, but what about the new US designated superintelligence? | |
| ▲ | Teever 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If my car rolls into you, you can say it rolled into you, or that I let it roll into you, but those things can both be true. | | |
| ▲ | nvme0n1p1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Okay, what are you getting at? You think the owner of a car isn't responsible for what the car does? | | |
| ▲ | praxulus 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The point is that it's a perfectly valid use of the English language to describe AI models as doing things, just as we do with all sorts of other clearly non-living things. This is true regardless of who carries the legal liability for those actions. | | |
| ▲ | Beached an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes, if my dog bites you, or if I drive my car into you, or if I dont put my parking brake on and it rolls down the hill and runs you over. I am the one who is responsible. Cops dont write a ticket to the off leash dog that ran across the street and sunk its teeth into my leg. They write it to the owner. Cops dont write a ticket to the car in neutral, they write it to the operator. If a PERSON executes software, and that software breaks the law, the PERSON that executed the software should be held responsible. AI is software. It is not a sentient person who can be fined, thrown in jail, or held accountable. |
| |
| ▲ | enraged_camel 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In law, intent matters. You should look up the difference between murder and manslaughter for example. Each has multiple degrees as well. | |
| ▲ | fastball 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not always? |
| |
| ▲ | EA-3167 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I would say that you were negligent in your responsibilities, and allowed the car to roll into me. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | EA-3167 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If your dog bites me I’d say it bit me, but that you assumed liability for your dogs actions. If the dog was a robot I’d say YOU attacked me using a robot. There’s a difference between a tool and an animal that is sometimes deployed as a tool. |
|
| ▲ | vrganj 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah but if I run you over with my car, I can't say my car ran you over. |
| |
| ▲ | lelandfe 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Did you or your self-driving car that you instructed to take you home plow through that sweet old lady | | |
| ▲ | Balooga 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Well, the law says that the person behind the wheel is responsible. | | | |
| ▲ | nativeit 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Did you instruct the self-driving car to explore random nearby surfaces without safety features enabled? | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |