| ▲ | sergiotapia 3 hours ago | |||||||
You're right it's much safer to click next > next > next > next > finish. | ||||||||
| ▲ | t-writescode 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
A big difference between the safety of "next > next > next > finish" and "curl | bash" is one of them is dynamically loaded from an external source that could change between runs, and the other can be fully downloaded and vetted in a single check, and then once it's safe, it's probably safe 10 years from now. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | carsoon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yeah installation has always been such a security issue. So many programs are just random links that download a file. You have to trust that the host has not been compromised all packages that were used to build it were not compromised etc. With ai models getting better we may be able to do analysis on the actual underlying bytes of the files we download to properly scan them for malicious code patterns and build systems which sandbox programs and watch inbound and outbound traffic/ system level actions from them and flag suspicious requests for further analysis by smarter models. REA shows that ai are very good at understanding low level code and reverse engineering it so this could potentially be applied to application level security aswell. | ||||||||