| ▲ | computerex an hour ago | |||||||
What a BS take. Do a cursory google search and you'll find many abuses of the Flock cameras. There is no oversight. How incredibly ironic: >One of [the officers] took the time to specifically mention how scary it would be for them, because people would be able to find out where they lived, when they got on their shift and what they were doing throughout the day, and that that type of powerful information could put them personally at risk [from] any bad apples that might want to track them down. This is the exact reason Flock cameras shouldn't exist. Hell even you know how there is no oversight otherwise you wouldn't have used the word "ostensibly" with italics. BTW did you just gloss over how they came to his home to intimidate him? Cops SHOULD be tracked because American cops are simply the worst bullies on the planet. | ||||||||
| ▲ | legitster an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> Do a cursory google search and you'll find many abuses of the Flock cameras. There is no oversight. We know about them because they were caught. > Cops SHOULD be tracked because American cops are simply the worst bullies on the planet. Cops are tracked. Part of the reason the above were caught because their searches were logged in Flock and used against them in criminal proceedings. But I'm not sure where you got that I am against police being tracked? | ||||||||
| ||||||||