| ▲ | zem 2 hours ago | |||||||
> now Deno will not be developed further. that's an interesting reflection on the nature of open source - in theory the source is there and "the community" could conceivably continue development. especially in the case of something like deno where the people most motivated to keep it alive are already programmers. but the reality is that however distributed an open source project is in theory, in practice it needs a single entity to steward it, otherwise it will die. hopefully that single entity can be a consortium of companies invested in using the runtime, sort of like opentofu recently. | ||||||||
| ▲ | saghm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
From a quick search, it looks like they raised $21 million in funding half a decade ago (after an earlier seed round), so this seems less like a reflection on the nature of open source in general and more just a reflection of this one project. It was set up in a way where development was happening because people were being paid to do it, and this time next year, they won't be. Maybe the community would have come in to try to keep it going if there wasn't any funding, or maybe it would have just stopped seeing any real development, but we can't really say for sure either way. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | syrusakbary 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> consortium of companies invested in using the runtime I believe this is very unlikely to happen. If the founder (Ryan) was involved in it or it have strong market position, it would have strong chances. Now, is a kingdom without a king and without strong companies to steward it forward. I hope to be wrong though! | ||||||||
| ||||||||