| ▲ | iamnothere 4 hours ago | |||||||
They are not fascists, they are somewhere between “right-socialists” and left-populists, seemingly very close to Titoism. There is a substantial difference. Fascism calls for fusion of corporations and state and I haven’t seen that from them. They have called for socialization of energy, but that’s common among many left parties. I am sick to death of the overapplication of the word “fascism”. It doesn’t mean “bad thing”. Distinct words are needed for distinct concepts, otherwise all political discourse ends up like here in America where you have “liberals” who are not actually liberal and “conservatives” who don’t want to conserve anything. Edit: edited to reflect that they are probably a lot closer to Tito than Hoxha or Juche, after thinking about it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | firefax 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
>I am sick to death of the overapplication of the word “fascism”. It doesn’t mean “bad thing”. So you admit they are a "bad thing", but you are annoyed I used the wrong word? | ||||||||
| ||||||||