I am not saying the content of the speech is morally equal, but Tor's explicit mission is to make people anonymous and protect speech. The moment you start inspecting it, Tor's mission is negated.

Of course, Tor's partnerships are different than the content distributed through it's network, but I still find it a bit ironic.

They're not talking about inspecting or controlling speech on the network, they're talking about speech outside their network and how it relates to them and their relationship with Mullvad.

> We are not terminating the relationship but are setting clear boundaries on our relationship with Mullvad

> We strongly oppose rhetoric that threatens other human rights and freedoms.