| ▲ | ForHackernews 5 hours ago | |
Radical idea here, but maybe those many companies could _fund_ the development of key components of their infrastructure. | ||
| ▲ | christoff12 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Indeed, seems like it should be pretty straightforward. I understand why the venture-backed entity couldn't do this, but given the reactions here, could a new maintainer not take over and simply charge for support and future enterprise features like the Sidekiq guy? | ||
| ▲ | galaxyLogic 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Maybe but only if that gives them a competitive advantage. | ||