Remix.run Logo
▲ SoftTalker 6 hours ago

You work 2000 hours in a year. You ideally have an employer you like and stay with for many years. That's not worth 9 hours of your time?

▲geraldwhen 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That’s not how it works for the applicant. Many people are applying to nearly 100 roles a month.

Suppose you get interviews on 10% of those. That’s 10 interview pipelines, and if every company had this policy, 90 unpaid interviewing hours.

Like the comment elsewhere in this thread, candidates will find other roles before your interview gauntlet concludes.

▲jghn 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Many people are applying to nearly 100 roles a month.

Spotted your first problem. Don't shotgun apply to anyone and everyone. You should only be applying to jobs you actually want.

▲Aurornis 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That’s not how it works. Interviews are like a funnel. If you don’t pass the first interview they don’t schedule you for all of the other hours just to keep going. You get dropped from the pipeline.

When a company says they have 9 hours of interview time, that’s usually the maximum time if you make it through all the rounds. If you get that far, you’re highly likely to get an offer.

You would also be surprised at how many people will actually do 10-20 long interview rounds to try to maximize their chances for the best job.

There are almost two different bubbles of candidates: Those who refuse to do anything more than a couple quick calls, and those who will rearrange their life to spend days putting in work for each job they want. I think that’s fine and everyone should do what works for them, but if you think 9 hours of interviewing is going to turn candidates away from a company like Oxide you’d be very surprised to see the quantity and caliber of applicants who line up for jobs like this.

I think you also might need to adjust your expectations now that AI interview cheating is getting out of control. A lot of companies are moving back to on-site interviews. I’d happily do 3 x 3 hour video calls more than flying and staying at hotels and renting cars to get to an office in another city just to interview.

▲malfist 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A hundred roles a month and call backs on 10% of them? That's A) and insane number of applications and B) a really high call back rate.

I'm on the market right now due to a layoff and I have an agent that reviews linkedin every morning and cross references levels.fyi for role leveling and salary and then assess fit to my resume. I get around 5-10 _possible_ positions per day and with human judgement that's usually down to 0-2, averaging about 0.5 per day.

I hear back from probably close to 10% but that's with a highly targeted approach, not just spamming my resume everywhere. And my pipeline is freaking full. It's a full time job doing prep and participating in all the interviews.

The only interview so far that's been a huge time sink has been anthropic's. But that's because I chose it. Their take home I have the option to use between 2 and 8 hours and I used the full 8 hours because I'm highly motivated and the position is well fit to my career history.

▲lotsofpulp 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe Oxide isn’t aiming to hire people who apply to 100 roles per month.

▲SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Agree. Shotgunning 100 applications a month is not a strategy for finding a good job. It says "I don't care where I work, or what the job is, here's my generic resume, please just hire me." And maybe you're that desperate, but IMO you'll get better returns spending more time on fewer/better opportunities.

▲stevekaram 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Not saying we are or aren't looking for that kind of candidate, but I _will_ say that we're very keen on the motivation to join Oxide at all, and the role you're applying for specifically.

▲shimman 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You get worse biases by favoring people that don't value their time IMO. Not too mention it doesn't favor working people with other obligations that can't afford to give away an entire shift to interview for a job they might not get.

▲podocarp 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's a loaded question. How about just saying it for what it is. Are you willing to spend 9 hours today (not counting the other interviews you have to do for other companies) for a X% probability of getting a job at company A which you like Y amount.

If X and Y are large enough sure. Most of the time X is hidden and Y is hard to gauge.