| ▲ | mjewkes 5 hours ago | |
> However, a proof of the Riemann hypothesis, say, may need new ideas that are strictly outside of the convex hull of current mathematical ideas [...] > After I finished writing this blog post, and had already sent it to Terry, OpenAI released a huge treasure trove of results in mathematics [including] the resolution of the so-called quasi Riemann Hypothesis We ought to all be careful about underestimating the speed and magnitude of the change that is coming. > if you are a student who is passionate to learn what is new and what is left to do, then a PhD is definitely the right path for you This is an awful lot of confidence to put behind career advice in a wildly changing world. Markets are real and tradeoffs bite. We're not in gay communist space utopia yet. | ||
| ▲ | sanxiyn 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I am not sure what you are trying to imply, but quasi-Riemann hypothesis is in fact not Riemann hypothesis and resolution of the former, while truly fucking amazing (it wouldn't be an exaggeration to say it is a discovery of century), gives no hint how to resolve the later. | ||