| ▲ | pks016 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> But it also sucks when mathematicians, who are considered experts on a particular problem, refuse to engage with breakthrough results about that problem. It might be a shock for you but they are very few in numbers. Most of researchers I know are always busy with something. They cannot just drop other responsibilities for something like this. They will take their own time getting through the proofs (if they want to). > That seems like a much healthier attitude towards these new results. Another thing to consider is not all mathematicians are from US or with good funding. The PI or graduate students cannot afford to pay 200/month. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | oliculipolicula 6 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think the role of specific _human_ mathematicians at OpenAI should not be understated. TFA was about a niche topic that OpenAI doesn't have in-house expertise in. Otoh Aaronson is the co-author on Lijie Chen's (reasoning lead at OAI) top cited paper. OAI have deployed their resources more effectively against UGC that some of their staff are already familiar with | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||