| ▲ | _virtu 3 hours ago |
| Pro tip you don’t even need an illustrator. While I do encourage hiring humans to do this work you can also use PolyCam with a phone that supports lidar, export it to Claude with Blender and voila. |
|
| ▲ | tiagod 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Pro tip the whole point is that it was made by an illustrator, and that's also the reason it's on the frontpage. |
| |
| ▲ | scubbo an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | It's _better_ that the illustrations were made by an illustrator, but it still would have been cool and front-page-worthy if that hadn't been the case. | |
| ▲ | vntok 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Maybe the reason is simply that it's a cool idea? This is typically the kind of hacking project that is preposterously non-economically-viable for 99% of homelabbers, let alone regular folks. Now, for the first time ever, AI is making it actually palatable for everyone who wants it done to have it done... and certainly much cheaper too at an equivalent quality level. | | |
| ▲ | KZerda an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Commissioning art like this is at most a few hundred dollars. As was posted elsewhere, there are lots of young artists that need to pad out their portfolios, as well as artists in places where the cost of living is significantly cheaper. This isn't a multi-thousand-dollar thing that only the 1% could afford. | |
| ▲ | orphea an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm sorry, I have a hard time understanding you. Correct me if I'm wrong, are you saying that 1. paying an illustrator is non-economically-viable for 99% of homelabbers? and 2. AI would have done it at an equivalent quality level? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hatthew an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most people don't have lidar phones, and commissioning this art is about the same price as buying a lidar phone. |
| |
| ▲ | happyopossum an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Most people don't have lidar phones the most popular phones in the US (iPhone pro max and pro) have had lidar cameras for the past 6 models... | | |
| ▲ | hatthew 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Some quick googling suggests that in the US, only 60% of people have iphones, and only 50% of iphones in use are pro or max. I would guess that HN skews towards more recent and higher end phones, but also skews towards android. Maybe saying most people don't have lidar is inaccurate, but I think it's still accurate to say the majority of people don't have lidar. | |
| ▲ | dwnw an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Most people don't have lidar phones. The statement is still very true, even if you said US only. What are you trying to say? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | arjie 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Damn that is a good tip. Thanks, dude. |
