| |
| ▲ | bubblethink an hour ago | parent [-] | | PERM is approved at a rate in high 90s. The government - this government - has approved PERM for all these corporations that it is slandering now. Here's a deposition from a DOL employee [1]: "Q Are any PERMs denied for fraud?
A Not to my knowledge." There is a PERM process, the government overwhelmingly approves it, it does not take anything to court or win. I am not sure what you are trying to argue. [1] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.266... | | |
| ▲ | pandaman an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | You are not giving the links to the prosecutions you claimed the government lost. | | |
| ▲ | bubblethink an hour ago | parent [-] | | I am claiming the government does not prosecute them or deny their PERM. What are you arguing? Can you state it clearly? | | |
| ▲ | pandaman 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You claimed that government does not successfully prosecute this, implying it prosecutes and fails. If you wanted to say it does not prosecute then you should just said so when I asked what prosecution did you mean. Also what are you arguing here? We both agree that inadmissibility does not require prosecution, so what's your point again? | | |
| ▲ | bubblethink 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | No, I never implied that they fail. They do not prosecute or deny any PERM certifications. PERM is anyway not tied to inadmissibility of an alien as PERM is an employer driven certification process. Recall that PERM is administered by the Dept. of Labor. Specifically for PERM, they need to prove in a court of law that the company is violating civil rights, labor laws, discriminating against a protected class, doing fraud, etc. They do not do that at the administrative level (by denying PERM) or at the judicial level (by winning a court case). All they do is make speeches on the campaign trail, and occasionally settle out of court as some other sibling comments' examples in Apple, META, etc. show. | | |
| ▲ | pandaman 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Okay, then I read you reply wrong and have no idea what are you trying to say. The law I quoted is about inadmissibility, PERM is a process to create an exception for an inadmissible alien as described in the law. Recall that the exception is created via DOL certifying that there are no sufficient able, qualified, willing and available workers. PERM is a way to conduct this certification. Read my first message you have responded, it has the link to the law. I am also not sure what you mean by this "They do not do that at the administrative level (by denying PERM) " because the news item you are commenting under is exactly about the blanket PERM denial. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | cyberax 7 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > "Q Are any PERMs denied for fraud? A Not to my knowledge." This is misleading. "Fraud" is a legal term, and it's difficult to prove. However, DoL can and will do an audit to verify that the PERM application is correct. If the audit fails (and they fail them often) they just deny the petition. | | |
|
|
