| ▲ | jselysianeagle 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> If you are skilled you will be around the skilled people who won the lottery. But it's a lottery that's truly random then there's no reason to believe that those that won the lottery would necessarily be highly skilled, right? Anecdotally, over the course of my ~15 yrs of experience in the industry, I've definitely met some brilliant people on H1-B visas but I'd put that estimate at around ~30% or so, the rest were just people of average skill / talent doing work that a US citizen could be doing. Again, just my personal observation, others may have wildly differing estimates based on places they've worked at. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hajile an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If H1b were about getting the most talented, it wouldn't be 75-80% from just one country and another 10% from a second country. I'd expect it to be very evenly distributed. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rayiner an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I mean that each employer petition on behalf of a worker is selected randomly. But, prior to the petition, the workers are hired by the companies in a non-random fashion. That’s important to keep in mind because I think a lot of people are like “oh the H1Bs I met working on AI at Google are super smart, so the program must bring over the best of the best.” But the system treats an H1B petition from WiPro the same as one from Google. Because the system is a lottery, it can be true that there are super smart H1bs working at Google and also that most of them are doing jobs many Americans could be doing. The lottery system makes the bar quite low and the spread very wide. | |||||||||||||||||