| ▲ | jeremyjh 2 hours ago | |||||||
I've been a tech manager for 21 years, much of that at a large Fortune 100 that had tens of thousands of employees from Infosys and TCS. The hourly rates we were charged for local workers on H1-B visas were $15-$30 less than we'd pay American contractors from body shops like Teksystems, and that is just what we were paying Infosys. The employee didn't see anywhere near that. Compared to FTE the difference was even larger including benefits and vacation time. The biggest issue though, is not the local people. The issue is that the local people are there to bridge the timezone and communication gaps so you can have three off-shore people for each on-shore. Offshore people were paid less than a third of on-shore. So the number of American jobs they are displacing, and the wages they were being replaced at, is absolutely staggering. Maybe in real tech companies its a different story. The one time I did a direct H1-B sponsorship (later, in a much smaller company), we did pay them an equal wage. | ||||||||
| ▲ | 00d9e3 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
HR is not allowed to tell you to prefer an H1B. They can strongly hint that you need to hit your DEI quota though. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | UncleMeat 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Presumably Infosys also pays citizen workers shitty too. The issue here is Infosys, not h1b. I will also add a data point for big tech. I have managed people on h1b, on o1, with green cards, and citizens. I have never even sniffed any sort of disparate treatment across these groups once hired. During hiring the bias was against h1b since it was a huge pain in the ass to arrange everything and their start date could be delayed. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jt2190 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Can you clarify? These workers were resident in the U.S. or abroad? | ||||||||
| ||||||||