Remix.run Logo
▲ floro 4 hours ago

OP is killing the village. No one will be left after the kids grow up.

▲Aboutplants 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I understand your line of thought, but the individual specifically being talked about is returning to her home to contribute to the success of her community. Literally the exact opposite of what you are complaining about. Seems like this form of support, just providing an opportunity, succeeds in its goal.

People leaving a village or city for other opportunities is nothing new and something pretty much all humanity (and species) experience.

▲ 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲shauryadav 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's a good point. If only a fraction of children can go into STEM subjects & can get good in practical knowledge. They can give a lot back to their community by creative problem solving with the limited resources they have!!

I think it's hard to get child curious towards particular domain if they don't get any external push of some sort. I got into computer science because I used to tweak computers & play games in childhood in home computer.

▲xydone 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What a strange thing to say

▲SoftTalker 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If the kids all have better lives, isn't that a good thing? What is noble about an impoverished village where everyone just exists?

▲ 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲mozvalentin 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The village is not alive.

▲pbhjpbhj an hour ago | parent [-]

A family is not alive.

▲otikik 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I hope when I am in need and someone thinks about helping me they don't find someone like you, man.

▲exitb 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That might be true, but should we clutch our pearls after we killed our villages?