Remix.run Logo
▲ droidjj 6 hours ago

If you haven’t read the book yet, I’m tempted to warn you against opening the visualization. Part of the joy of reading this book is letting your mind’s eye run wild, and I fear if I read it for the first time after toying with this site, I’d be remembering the cities rather than conjuring them.

▲vanadium1st 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That is the exact problem with the city of Dinipro.

Citizens of this city high in the sky imagine it so fully in their minds that no one there needs to open their eyes to walk the streets and live their normal lives. But if one makes the mistake of opening their eyes and tries to see the city directly, they would immediately fall through the clouds to the ground deep below.

▲falcor84 5 hours ago | parent [-]

On that note, I'd quite recommend the Coyote vs. Acme movie, some great world building there.

▲quxbar 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In fact, having a physicalized 3D representation of the cities is IMHO antithetical to the text. I don't think OP ever stopped to ask if there was more to Calvino's work than 'cool city descriptions'.

▲losvedir 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I heartily recommend the audiobook, narrated by John Lee.

The book is a trip and the dreamy sort of narration matched it perfectly. My wife and I would spend evenings listening to one city at a time, on a walk around our little park, one headphone in each ear. I don't know if it was just the environment or the time in our lives, but we both really look back fondly on this book.

▲soco 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I read the book decades ago, then I lost it in one of the many relocations. I always thought I should buy it again but never acted on the idea... A few years ago, I was walking by an antiquarian, and noticed a thin unmarked gray spine. I entered, picked it up, paid, and walked away.

PS I didn't open the gallery. Nice idea but I don't care about visualizing something I should feel.

▲TeMPOraL an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Only applicable to those who have a "mind's eye". Some of us don't.

▲stared 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I fully agree, thank you for this warning.

How Opus 5.5 imagines these cities is a question for Opus. The real experience is how we imagine - and I believe there are no two people who have exactly the same mental image of an invisible city.

▲DennisP 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Checking Amazon, several of the available editions are illustrated, which I suppose would have the same problem.

▲mcphage 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I’d be remembering the cities rather than conjuring them

Having looked at some of them (and it being one of my favorite books) ... it won't do that. These visualizations are as terrible as they are unnecessary.

▲drcongo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Don't worry about opening the GPT-6 Astra one though, those ones are so bad that your brain will immediately expunge them.

▲sixothree 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe the interactive link in the article for the optic focus can lead you on a fun journey instead. And the bottom-right of every visualization is a link to yet another fun diorama to explore.

▲miltonlost 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's a techie creating the torment nexus but the imagination version. No need to picture in your mind the invisible cities! Time to make them visible!!!

Talk about missing the entire point of the piece of literature.

▲FuturisticLover 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I opened it because I had no idea what Invisible Cities meant here. I thought they might be some real cities that don't come up on maps.

The website gives you a good hint before opening up the visuals. So, I got an idea.

I don't really know about Marco Polo. My only knowledge comes from the Netflix series, which doesn't talk about these invisible cities.

▲ 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
▲frshgts 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Invisible Cities is a book.