Call me when peer review confirms it; until then, it is noise fitting noise. (Reason: Clean cut through the hype directly to scientific validation.)

I don't understand the downvotes on this topic. Almost everybody is in grey :)

	▲	handoflixue 13 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's hacker news, not academia news. Dismissing something for lacking formal academic review is counter to the ethos of the site, and the link itself mentions that verification is coming in a month and there's at least a loose consensus of actual people that this might be valid. If they'd said "excited to see if this replicates in November!" I would have at least believed that they'd read the link and/or had some interest in the topic. I don't see any value in "this topic doesn't interest me", though
	▲	wartywhoa23 15 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		The color of truth on HN.
	▲	justsomehnguy 12 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That's the usual state of things. I even vouched for a green comment because it was in a spirit yet for some it was not.