Remix.run Logo
▲ markus_zhang 7 hours ago

This definitely asks for a black ribbon on top of HN.

What a loss!

▲dlphii 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Cannot agree more! What a loss for all CS!

▲mrexroad 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

100%

Tangent: Her LEGO minifig next to the Apollo code is one of my, and my daughter’s, favorites.

▲abetusk 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/women-of-nasa-21312

▲artisinal 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Direct image link for those that don't want to have to click multiple modals:

https://www.lego.com/cdn/cs/set/assets/blt75c3f3f6b4cb0e7c/2...

▲quantified 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This feels like the top honor.

▲tarellel 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes please, This is absolutely necessary

▲omnicognate 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Good Lord yes

▲kragen 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲diskzero 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A somewhat odd question and the best we can do is theorize and come up with opinions gathered from those who knew or associated with her. Maybe others who worked with her will comment here. We do know that the people who worked at the Draper Lab were "hackers" given one definition of hackers as a group of people who were fascinated with computers and systems that interconnected them. The Draper folks were certainly part of that early MIT culture.

I know from personal experience working with Draper alums that many of them had very close personal and economic ties to the military and other government agencies and were not at all into Kevin Mitnick-type hackers.

She certainly kept a low profile and maybe wouldn't want to be memorialized or maybe just didn't care. We are so used to people promoting and pushing their accomplishments these days, she seems somewhat of an anomaly; an extremely skilled and influential technologist who was content to continue doing the work that suited her without endless self-promotion and aggrandizement.

She did accept the Presidential Medal of Freedom, so she was willing to accept some accolades.

▲kragen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I think she would consider it insulting to be called a "hacker", and not because she thought the term referred to computer criminals.

▲omnicognate 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Guess it's no surprise hackernews has forgotten what a hacker is. Hint: Margaret Hamilton was a hacker.

▲esseph 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Absolutely. She was pushing tons of limits and exploring tons of things, with no real financial prize.

▲jxf 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Margaret Hamilton was 1,000% a hacker. She basically pioneered the foundations of asynchronous code and was one of the first people to work on rockets at a time when software engineering was in its infancy.

▲kragen 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm well aware of her impressive achievements. But she had to share computing resources with the original "hackers", the ones who gave us the word, and I don't think she was very fond of them, or of the hacking approach in general; her ingenuity was great but not especially playful. So I don't think she would want to be memorialized here.

▲AnimalMuppet 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't particularly care what you think about what she would think about the definition of a word used in the site name. She's a person worth remembering and honoring.

Let your weird fixation on the word stop you from honoring her here if you want. It won't stop me.

Rest in peace, Margaret.

▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲oliyoung 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What's your definition of "hacker"

In the Hacker News sense, its those of us who use tools to "hack" together solutions, not in the "hack" systems to gain entry

▲kragen 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://stallman.org/articles/on-hacking.html

> It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied as hacking, but I think what these activities have in common is playfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking means exploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playful cleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hack value".

I do not think that Margaret Hamilton would appreciate her exploration of the limits of what is possible, which was extensive, being described as dedicated to a spirit of playful cleverness.

▲mcmcmc 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I shudder to think of Stallman’s idea of “playful cleverness”

▲kragen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I suggest reading the linked page to see what he thought was an especially good example. It involved using chopsticks to eat Korean food in an unnecessarily difficult way.

▲esseph 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> In the Hacker News sense, its those of us who use tools to "hack" together solutions, not in the "hack" systems to gain entry

You may not realize this depending on what computer culture you fell into / timeframe, but they're often the same people.

I know a staggering number of CEOs, CTOs, CISOs that were "messing around" with everything from FBI, NSA, etc sites in their teenage years.

▲kragen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Of course, but none of this is relevant to what Margaret Hamilton thought about hackers, except in the sense that she didn't appreciate people "messing around" with the systems she depended on, in ways that had very little to do with computer security, which wasn't a thing in that context. (Though other researchers on campus were working on it.)

▲ 3 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
▲gcheong 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Your point? Whatever her opinion, her contributions are undeniable.

▲kragen 7 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲kulahan 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Weird thing to pretend to be worried about.

▲kragen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲ 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]