Remix.run Logo
▲ cgio an hour ago

I thought that was from the outset the intent of the Hilbert program, to automate mathematics. And mathematicians were behind it. Cannot see why they would be concerned when a different way to do the same, not subject to Gödel incompleteness, is working out. Maybe the frustration is that they were not the ones building it.

▲jltsiren 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Hilbert's program was ultimately about humans studying the nature of mathematics. People had different opinions about whether the idea even made sense and what would be a desirable outcome.

Gödel's incompleteness also constrains human and AI mathematicians. Both just strive to prove whatever can be proven in the system they are working in.

▲cgio 8 minutes ago | parent [-]

Gödel blocked the path to axiomatic derivation of a full consistent body of mathematics as far as I understand. Mathematicians and AI are not working in these constraints but rather with these constraints.

▲senorcrab 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Why do you think Godel Incompleteness doesnt apply? By default mathematicians work in ZFC which is proven to be incomplete...