| ▲ | cgio an hour ago | |||||||
I thought that was from the outset the intent of the Hilbert program, to automate mathematics. And mathematicians were behind it. Cannot see why they would be concerned when a different way to do the same, not subject to Gödel incompleteness, is working out. Maybe the frustration is that they were not the ones building it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jltsiren 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Hilbert's program was ultimately about humans studying the nature of mathematics. People had different opinions about whether the idea even made sense and what would be a desirable outcome. Gödel's incompleteness also constrains human and AI mathematicians. Both just strive to prove whatever can be proven in the system they are working in. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | senorcrab 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Why do you think Godel Incompleteness doesnt apply? By default mathematicians work in ZFC which is proven to be incomplete... | ||||||||