| ▲ | Despite what Watson said, Rosalind Franklin understood structure of DNA first(link.springer.com) | ||||||||||||||||
| 38 points by gumby 2 hours ago | 6 comments | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bondarchuk 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
So did Franklin provably realize the double-helix structure of DNA first or not? A lot of beating about the bush here but the article stops just short of actually explicitly making the claim it's working so hard to imply, AFAICT... (edit: should note the HN submission title (at present "Despite what Watson said, Rosalind Franklin understood structure of DNA first") does not actually occur in TFA) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | howunfortunate 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ChrisArchitect an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | antonvs 20 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
No-one should take Watson seriously. He exploited institutional sexism, systemic minimization, and unequal credit distribution to aggrandize his own contribution. It's a good example of why efforts like "DEI" are important - because if you leave things to people in a position of privilege, you get a completely distorted picture. | |||||||||||||||||