This idea that we are going to work our way backwards into a competitive landscape is not going to work.

“Pick and choose which cards they accept without penalty” won’t do anything in a market where 3-4 card processors and 3-5 banks have a near-monopoly on transactions.

If I sell ice cream and decide I won’t accept Chase credit cards because the fees are too high I’ve just lost 1/4 of my customers or something crazy high like that.

Let’s quit trying to find weird workarounds to keep capitalist failures propped up and use regulatory teeth.

Cap transaction fees at something reasonable like 0.5% and the problem disappears overnight.

Yes, you’ll lose your rewards, and that’s a good thing. Rewards cards are a massive wealth transfer mechanism that shouldn’t be legal.

▲

latsu 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There are businesses that specifically don't allow credit cards and only allow Debit and Cash to reduce these fees already and they are still in business. WinCo Foods is the biggest example I know of, so insinuating that it's impossible to operate if you exclude payment method types/cards isn't really true.

	▲	eszed 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Size matters. WinCo is big enough to do that, because it's a chain and a brand, and people make a choice to go there despite knowing ahead of time that's how it works. (That said, the first time I went into a WinCo I abandoned a cart-load of groceries because I had neither a debit card nor enough cash with me.) That doesn't work for a small business, like the ice cream shop in the example GP offered. They will be giving up a significant fraction of their custom.
	▲	srdjanr 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Of course what parent comment said doesn't apply to 100% of businesses, bud I'd say it does apply to at least 80-90%. So I agree with them that it wouldn't work very effectively.

▲

fasterik 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

According to economic theory, price controls produce shortages. It's likely that capping transaction fees would have unintended consequences, for instance excluding customers from being able to get a credit card in the first place. I'm not against all regulation, but I think we should prefer market-based solutions that remove barriers to entry and that allow more companies to compete in the space.

▲

eszed 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Europe offers a useful counter-example. They (EU? Most countries? I don't know exactly, but it's immaterial) cap transaction fees, and there's absolutely no shortage of "ways to pay by card". In my experience there are, in fact, more - and, their middle-men have been earlier adopters of both security and convenience features (PIN codes, tap-to-pay, and rapid settlement among them) in which the US sometimes still lags.

What there aren't are rampant cash-back rewards for using a particular card. Or easy access to credit cards with usurorious rates. I think missing out on those is a societally good outcome.

▲

gblargg 3 hours ago | parent [-]

If you cap price then quality will probably suffer, i.e. less fraud protection, warranty extension, accidental damage coverage, etc.

	▲	simonra an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		These things have long been solved through consumer protection legislation in the developed part of the world. Despite responsibility for card fraud, including debit cards, being placed banks and payment processors, northern Europe has a healthy consumer banking market. Vendors being required to warranty purchases for up to 5 years also hasn't killed off commerce or smaller and tiny actors. The home content insurances strike a decent balance for accidents. Sure, the total cost might not be that different in aggregate (you pay for consumer protections through versting being slightly more expensive), but at the same time it's difficult to envision cutting out or severely limiting a profit driven middle man overall being more expensive.
	▲	lossolo 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> warranty extension, accidental damage coverage What does that have to do with CC fees? In the EU, you get all of these with any payment method, and in many EU countries credit cards are the least used payment option because there are better alternatives.

▲

SoftTalker 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The credit card companies make the vast majority of their revenue on interest charges. The transaction fees are at least in part returned to the cardholder via rewards programs. That said, I agree that competitive market solutions are better than regulation, where they work.

▲

mitxela an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

This is the argument that was used in Europe when Europe put a very low hard cap on these fees (0.2%). Do you know what actually happened? Nothing happened, everyone kept using cards as normal, actually more people did because it was cheaper, the card companies cried because they got less profit but kept operating because it was still positive, there were no shortages.

Dan why can't I post more comments?