| ▲ | abroszka33 a day ago |
| The intro video is just lame. Those things never happen in real life. |
|
| ▲ | twoodfin a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| They're making the point—apparently too subtly—that text alone is a highly limiting "UI" for many tasks. So it's great that GPT-6 can now communicate in a a richer interactive medium. |
| |
| ▲ | abroszka33 a day ago | parent [-] | | Then show a real task where text is limiting. Don't make up stupid examples. | | |
| ▲ | twoodfin a day ago | parent [-] | | They’re making fun of the frustration of trying to use ChatGPT purely through text for these tasks. Like I said, it’s too subtle a deliberate self-own. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | bogdiyan a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| So you never have to assemble a bike or paint a room. How those are not real world examples?
I find their video pretty cool. For people with ADHD or people learning by watching or children this is spot on. |
| |
| ▲ | mogrinz a day ago | parent [-] | | They made fake, terrible artifacts (colorless paint chips, text-only city guides and instruction manuals) to show how terrible that is, and then "fixed" them. The problem is, in reality their examples don't exist. Paint chips have color samples. City guides have maps, pictures, and color. Instruction manuals almost always have illustrations. If what you made is better than what exists, you should compare it to what exists and not some alternate reality. | | |
| ▲ | emkoemko a day ago | parent [-] | | hahah yea i was wondering what kind of paint chips wouldn't have the dang color on it.... |
|
|