| ▲ | lukan 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printing is good for prototyping and if you are making small numbers/need to have a distributed manufacturing (because of bombs falling on them). But for mass producing a solid design, 3D printing is the worst solution, because it is slow. Injection molding would be the fast (and cheap) way. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 233mhz 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yeah but it's fast enough, light, portable, repairable, can be setup directly in your bunker in the middle of the wood if needed, etc. You're still thinking like it's 1990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | georgemcbay 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> But for mass producing a solid design, 3D printing is the worst solution, because it is slow. Injection molding would be the fast (and cheap) way. ~10 years ago I was really into designing my own "drones" (but the kind that don't kill people) and I primarily used a CNC machine (Shapeoko 3). Multirotor vehicles are a good match for designs that are a series of mostly flat plates connected via simple standoffs and you can knock those out really quick with a CNC machine. Injection molding is certainly much better than 3D printing for scale, but CNC is a nice middle ground that allows for quick manufacture while still having a lot of the same flexibility for iterative design that you get with 3D printing. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||