Remix.run Logo
▲ Retr0id an hour ago

It's a real shame Google isn't more transparent about how it actually works, and doesn't provide any mechanism for classifying images in bulk or offline.

This is the best SynthID write-up I've found so far: https://fyx.me/articles/attempting-model-extraction-of-googl...

It covers how it actually works (probably), and how to train your own classifier for it, with some seemingly decent results.

▲MisterMunchkin an hour ago | parent | next [-]

They don't want you to know, because they're the baddies. Imagine how much money they can get from advertisers if they're able to identify every single piece of code, reddit thread, email, GitHub readme that you've ever written based on your secret ID. They're creaming themselves just thinking about it.

"Excellent work acquiring that outlook data Anat, now let's cross check the defunct company emails against YouTube videos edited with Google PrivateEditAI™ to figure out what the social security number of this YouTube account is."

▲Avicebron an hour ago | parent [-]

Unfortunately this is the truth, no one can be given a benefit of the doubt because despite years of good grace they have been anti-user and enshittified everything they touch.

▲elevation an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> It's a real shame Google isn't more transparent about how it actually works

> classifying images in bulk or offline

You've described exactly the elements spammers and fraudsters need to be able to defeat this mechanism.

▲Retr0id an hour ago | parent [-]

Well it's not a very good mechanism then, is it.

▲_flux an hour ago | parent [-]

Is it possible to implement a very good mechanism?