| ▲ | adev_ 14 hours ago | |
> That said, it hardly seems like the innovative underdog some comments here make it out to be. It's definitively not a revolution, but it is a major jump forward compared to Mistral Medium 3.5. Worth to notice that they explicitly said they still refining the model, so we might expect something a little bit better at the end of the month For something trained on a limited budget and 4000 GPUs, it is quite respectable. | ||
| ▲ | user43928 12 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I'm just wondering if it's really the result of impressive innovation, in line with comments saying that Mistral might in the future beat a bankrupt OpenAI due to being more profitable or efficient. Or if it's more a situation where I could have Opus 5.5 go through recent papers from the Chinese labs to apply these to a new large training run, resulting in a model that performs similarly to Mistral Large 4. I honestly don't know. | ||