Why?

Being able to solve NP hard optimization problems would enable progress in many areas of science and technology. For example it would allow us to find poly-sized Lean proofs for theorems efficiently, since proof verification can be done in polynomial time.

It would also be amusing to annihilate nearly six decades of proofs that assume P!=NP.

▲

manquer 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Could also break the basic principles underlying most encryption approaches. I would rather have my bank account not stolen and internet working

	▲	echelon 8 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I've had enough Internet for one lifetime. As long as we also get low order polynomial solutions to important problems, it'll be worth it. Besides, unencrypted wifi was funny.

▲

charcircuit 14 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Even if P=NP it doesn't mean that the P approach will be better than the heuristic approach we already do today.

	▲	adrianN a few seconds ago \| parent [-]
		Of course, if we get ridiculous polynomials it doesn't mean much in practice. People who hope for P=NP generally hope for nice polynomials O(n^3) or something like that at worst.