| ▲ | bjourne 2 hours ago | |
My pet peeve are numbers with too many decimals. If you only run a benchmark three times and take the arithmetic mean you don't have five or more significant digits. At best, you have two. And for benchmarking the geometric mean is a far superior mean. | ||
| ▲ | jrk an hour ago | parent [-] | |
For averaging multiple different benchmarks, the geometric mean makes sense. For removing measurement noise from a single benchmark, min or median is usually the right statistic. | ||