| ▲ | MinimalAction 3 hours ago | |||||||
For the uninitiated, why is this interesting given it doesn't seem to be so much below the threshold? | ||||||||
| ▲ | bawolff 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
O(n lg n) is a bit of a threshold value. For a lot of algorithms, this is the best you can do, even in theory (similar to how O(n^2) is also a threshold for many algorithms). So for many algorithms, people stop trying when they get close to O(n lg n) on the belief that you'll never do better than that. The fact that you can in principle go faster than n lg n, even if just by an almost imperceptible amount, is kind of surprising. It raises the question of, if n lg n isn't the limit, what is? How far down can we get the speed? If we can get it a little past n lg n, maybe we can go a lot further. [or at least that is my understanding. not a theoretical computer scientist] | ||||||||
| ▲ | Chinjut 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It's interesting because people wondered if it was possible to go below the threshold at all, that's all. Many suspected it was not possible. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||