| ▲ | jffry 9 hours ago | |
You seem to be thinking about "adblocker running in browser", since you brought up EULAs. That's not what OP alleges - they are saying people are redistributing modified versions of OP's copyrighted code. DMCA is an appropriate measure in such a situation, but it's unclear why OP's DMCA takedown was rejected by GitHub. Without more detail, it's hard to comment further | ||
| ▲ | verdverm 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |
one would think, if it is still up there, OP might point us at it so we can see for ourselves, right now it's "trust me" | ||