There are 100s of web based photo editors, paid and open source. How do you know they are taking yours, not someone else's or making their own with Ai?

I would imagine they all converge on common features and core implementation foundation

▲

ChrisRR 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> How do you know they are taking yours, not someone else's

Because if the javascript source matches the source in the repo, then they copied it

▲

IvanK_net 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There have been only two photo editors that fully support the PSD format: Photopea and Adobe Photoshop. When a new one appears, which fully supports the PSD format, from an anonymous creator, it is very likely a copy one of these two. And they usually name it Photopea-offline, etc.

▲

verdverm 10 hours ago | parent [-]

but does it actually fully support the PSD format or is it false advertising?

This day in age, we need to verify ourselves

Can you show us an example? How did you verify?

▲

IvanK_net 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

These Github repositories contain copies of my JS files (identical JS - letter by letter), with a few lines deleted to allow running it on any domain.

I wanted to discuss the behaviour of Github without giving these "projects" even more attention.

▲

sampullman 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The website is public, you can verify yourself.

	▲	verdverm 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's the original, where's the copy, specifically the one OP DMCA'd, which is supposedly not taken down...? I would think a github link would be easy to provide, sus that it hasn't been

▲

10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]