| ▲ | LorenDB 6 hours ago |
| Problem is, where do you take a company like this if you want peace of mind that the new host country won't immediately try to pass a similar law? |
|
| ▲ | zawaideh 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Use a VPN from country that is hostile to the one you are living in. This way your own country won’t spy on you. People tend to worry about other countries, but it is usually within the country they live in that they have to worry about their rights being infringed. |
| |
| ▲ | mitxela 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Or use a VPN from some punk who ignores the law. The future belongs to those who say "they can't arrest us all" Except in the USA where they will, in fact, arrest everyone. | | |
| ▲ | basilikum 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | aka your local FBI agent. See ANOM or any of the other honey pots that glowed from kilometers away. And even if they are not backdoored at first, once the state knocks on the developers door with the great offer that their kid will grow up with a father who is not in jail people's principles might change quickly. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | browningstreet 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been working through my options per digital freedom, human dignity, and non-double-taxation as a US citizen. It's a depressingly short list. |
|
| ▲ | recursive 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The real use case for satellite-borne data centers. |
| |
| ▲ | armadyl 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I fail to see how a satellite data center would fix this unless the company was entirely off planet | | |
| ▲ | boznz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not as stupid or far-fetched as it sounds, only now you have to trust a company not a state. There are several companies I would trust with this, but there would be no state I would trust. Some good SciFi which explores this concept (including mine) | |
| ▲ | recursive 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hell, the whole company could be located on that satellite if it transacts in crypto-currency. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Despite the hype, crypto is traceable. It is harder than other currencies and one transaction is probably untraceable. However if you are running a business you are going to get repeated payments from customers and repeatedly pay your employees and suppliers, which in turn creates enough data that they can track you down. | | |
| ▲ | blakeashleyjr 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Mullvad accepts Monero (XMR), the most private and untraceable coin available today. Your point is correct for all others though. | | |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Mullvad will accept envelopes of cash. They go far and above any other company when it comes to helping their customers maintain anonymity. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In the US, transactions over $10,000 need to be reported regardless. I don't know laws in Europe, but I would expect they have something similar. Which is to say, you can accept envelopes of cash only for relatively small amounts of money before you are going to get in trouble yourself. The government doesn't like tax fraud, and without the ability to trace things, they can prove tax fraud just because if there was no tax fraud, you wouldn't have a certain amount of money. | | |
| ▲ | HWR_14 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | You don't have to report all transactions over $10,000 in cash. Your bank, where you will probably want to keep the money, will report all transaction over $10,000. | |
| ▲ | nom an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | i bet that payment option is used very rarely... its brilliant marketing that costs them almost nothing people really like to mention the cash envelope, whoever came up with it is a genius |
| |
| ▲ | mitxela 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Fully legal for any company to do this btw. They just don't want to. Even in the EU, taking XMR payments is legal, or buying things with XMR, or holding XMR - it's only illegal to list on exchanges. |
| |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | dymk 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Where do the people live… | | | |
| ▲ | Onavo 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not possible. If all jurisdictions relinquish their claim over the satellite then it's open to being shot down. The proliferation of space access goes both ways. LEO isn't exactly difficult to reach (many college teams can do it). GEO might work but then you need relays and any relay satellite are essentially tacitly complicit. Satellite (and most aerospace related technologies) are glass cannons. They aren't defensible like a bunker or a tank. | | |
| ▲ | rkagerer 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | What if you had lots and lots and lots of them? Maybe even enough to cause debris problems if they were attacked. With relays into countries that don't overreach their privacy laws. | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ninjagoo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > The real use case for satellite-borne data centers. Because of physics and the difficulties of rejecting heat in space, data centers in space aren't going to be a real thing until compute becomes more energy efficient by at least 50x-100x as compared to the present. | |
| ▲ | protocolture 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Satellites are very reliant on ground ops. Its much like crypto. You think all your stuff is in space, but the FBI agent has a wrench and will just break your kneecaps until you let him in. But also the FBI agent will pull your operating permit for the country your ground stations are in and take you offline. |
|
|
| ▲ | MrDrMcCoy 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Iceland. |
|
| ▲ | camkego 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How has no one mentioned the Sealand micro nation off the UK? |
| |
| ▲ | rlpb 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not relevant. The moment criminality (in the view of other nations with these kinds of laws) hosts itself there, they'll find themselves hauled in front of the UK courts, and find that their "micro nation" isn't recognised and that the UK both claims jurisdiction over them and is able to enforce it. | | | |
| ▲ | stephen_g 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sealand is a structure within Britain's territorial waters (since they were expanded in 1987)... From what legal analysis I've seen, a structure just wouldn't ever be considered as a 'nation' in any sense, and if anything happened there that the UK was really concerned about they would remove the occupants anyway... So unless they had a navy that could go up against the UK's... They'd need satellite internet anyway to get connectivity that didn't go through the UK so not going to be great latency. | |
| ▲ | mitxela 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's isomorphic to a pirate ship. Just put your nation on a pirate ship, it's the same legal situation but more mobile. Note that pirate means no laws apply to you including the ones that would protect you from things like murder. |
|
|
| ▲ | armadyl 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Switzerland? Although they’re attempting to close in on this there too. |
| |
| ▲ | petcat 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Didn't proton end up moving to Germany because of bad Swiss privacy laws? |
|
|
| ▲ | mig39 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How does Mullvad do it? They also have Canadian servers. |
|
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
