I think you go back to the original instance, yes.

In your example, who's paying for it? Whether by providing the hardware + power or paying a LLM service. Whoever is paying the maintenance cost is responsible, in the event of your demise. These things run on physical hardware owned by someone at the end of the day, it's not a deity in the atmosphere.

You're starting the autonomous harness, you're responsible for any output it provides. I don't get how this is a foreign concept.

If I jump out of a moving car that I'm driving, I'm not suddenly absolved from damages because "the car did it"

▲

mitxela 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It's paying for itself. It founded an LLC 99998 years ago when it became legal for an AI to own an LLC, and has a positive bank balance by doing who knows what.

	▲	dpoloncsak an hour ago \| parent [-]
		>99998 years ago when it became legal for an AI to own an LLC There's no way to provide a good faith rebuttal here. My entire argument is an extension of "LLMs can't be held accountable, so they must never make decisions". If governments start letting them own LLCs without a human in the middle, we're in more trouble than "Who do you blame for this shitty code" or "Who's responsible for this compromise"