| ▲ | roarcher 2 hours ago |
| Pretty sure the parent comment was sarcasm. |
|
| ▲ | EGreg 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > was sarcasm Far from it. This is an example of Poe’s law, a very frequent occurrence on the internet. This isn’t a clear example of sarcasm any more than the pelican is a clear example of AGI! |
| |
| ▲ | phlakaton 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I agree, it wasn't clear at all to me... until I clicked the links. Now it's clear to me. Surely we live in the AGI times that were prophesied. | |
| ▲ | roarcher an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I guess I thought the sarcasm was obvious because I can't imagine a serious person looking at that pelican and considering it proof of AGI. But you're right, this is the internet, anything is possible. |
|
|
| ▲ | unconscionable an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Was this a sarcastic comment? |
