| ▲ | chasil 2 hours ago | |
What is really surprising to me is that Smalltalk was originally targeted as an educational language for children: https://worrydream.com/EarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk/#smalltalkAnd... In this way, it was the older brother of Logo, but with a core object scaffold that was far more influential. | ||
| ▲ | Jtsummers 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> it was the older brother of Logo Logo predated Smalltalk, so Smalltalk is more like an evolution on the idea and a younger brother. EDIT: Looked up the dates. Logo was made in 1967, Smalltalk started development in 1969. | ||