perhaps, but prompting is quickly becoming another area where humans are no longer clearly superior.

Getting LLMs to prompt other LLMs in a loop is not hard, it doesn't produce great results most of the time, but that is changing.

▲

calmworm an hour ago | parent [-]

What is “getting LLMs to prompt other LLMs” if not a prompt?

▲

pixl97 an hour ago | parent [-]

I'm pretty sure the initial post said "humans had to prompt", or otherwise insinuate a human in the loop.

▲

dpoloncsak 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain?

▲

hackyhacky 15 minutes ago | parent [-]

You are describing the " unmoved mover", an argument for the existence of God

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover

▲

dpoloncsak 9 minutes ago | parent [-]

I don't think so...? Maybe I'm understanding the article wrong? I get the overlay, but I'm being specific to LLM chains... They require something to kick them off, they do not act autonomously. A human does something, types, speaks, presses a button, whatever. A Cron Job firing off is the result of a prior prompt, by a human.

I don't follow the chain further back than that, as I believe humans have free will. I get that that's debated, but thats why I draw the line at human action.

	▲	hackyhacky a minute ago \| parent [-]
		I don't think Free Will is the issue here. My argument is that humans require input to act. We can't test that theory, because there is never been a human being who did not receive input. Everything that we experience from birth through childhood into adulthood is our input and forms our choices about what to do. That includes what the study, who to love, what our hobbies are, what kind of work we pursue.