| ▲ | reacharavindh 7 hours ago | |
I’m neither in the camp of Chinese or the Americans(collective West) in general.. As a neutral party, this characterization is crazy. As if the AI companies - Claude and OpenAI are guardians of freedom and humanity and very charitable to the global society without any self interests… “Chinese models are subsidized by the Chinese Government, therefore they’re inherently bad for humanity” is a highly propagandist argument. The politics of US vs China may be whatever it is in reality.. You have one company releasing their models for cheap, actually open sourcing their trained weights, and publishing details of their optimizations and learnings for others to use. The other camp actively “aligning” their models, nerfing their capabilities, hyping their swarm activities from poor sandboxes, and trying their best to lock users into their harnesses and walled platforms. They are subsidized by the capitalist VCs who are essentially waiting for their payouts.. At some point, one has to see things for what they are and evaluate their own reasoning.. I’m happy to stay provider agnostic, try all models and cheer any useful progress as open as possible. | ||