| ▲ | soco an hour ago | |
So you actually agree with us here: you set up an automation, or set up an AI, to plagiarize. You (automation), and OpenAI (AI set up), are correctly being sued. Because none of you thought "do it New Yorker style" also means "do it legally". And no, legality is not optional - even for techbros. | ||
| ▲ | Razengan an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> And no, legality is not optional As some other people mentioned, AI refuses to enhance private photos if they HAPPEN TO contain Disney material etc. If my own, personal, private photo happens to contain an t-shirt or toy or whatever of Mickey Mouse somewhere in a TINY corner of the photo, does that count as copyright infringement? What if I'm asking AI to work on a photo of some sidewalk café that includes a person in the background reading a newspaper, with its comics section visible which exposes the signatures of several artists? No one anywhere would say that's intentional plagiarism. Intent matters in legality - even for suebros. | ||