Wikipedia doesn't think so, citing the US copyright office

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_P...

kevin_thibedeau 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Visual artists have a right of attribution via the Visual Artists Rights Act (17 U.S.C. § 106A). This includes protection against misattribution.

▲

gruez 5 hours ago | parent [-]

>This includes protection against misattribution.

What does the case law say on what counts as "misattribution"? If a paste the "BLOPER" signature onto a jpeg, did I commit a crime right then and there? What if I put a notice next to it saying "btw it's not actually Brendan Loper"? What if I took that image (with the notice), uploaded it for the whole world to see, then some guy cropped out the "btw it's not actually Brendan Loper"?

	▲	boilerupnc 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This reminds me of the Helen Green David Bowie Gif image (https://dollychops.tumblr.com/post/107517113745/happy-birthd... ) that got changed, tweaked, cropped, distorted and distributed by humans without attribution in all sorts of places [0] over ten years ago. I recall Mediachain (which was later acqui-hired by Spotify to help address attribution and licensing) would talk about this problem and proposing blockchain ledger approaches to help validate a media files similarity to existing content and notification to the original artist of its use. Didn’t follow them closely, but Spotify saw some value in their attribution ideas. [0]. https://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/16/digital-images-photos-gi...

▲

jdiff 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is true, it'd be a trademark issue if anything, not a copyright one. From this page:

> it may be reproduced, as long as the reproduction cannot be mistaken for an authentic signature.

▲

gruez 6 hours ago | parent [-]

>as long as the reproduction cannot be mistaken for an authentic signature.

Which seems applicable in this case, because the image is clearly generated by AI (at least to the guy who prompted it).

	▲	dwattttt an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The guy who forges a signature isn't confused about who wrote that signature either.