No one should be allowed to claim they drew something when they didn’t draw any part of it and LLM’s are not people/can’t work without a person. We don’t credit pens and paintbrushes after all.

One could argue nobody should be allowed to claim it. It just exists.

▲

zahlman 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

For the record, the original tweet doesn't explicitly claim anything at all; it just shows the generated image.

▲

_carbyau_ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But it didn't just blink into existence.

Even if the person can't claim the copyright of the image produced they ARE responsible for the use of their tools and what they do with the output.

In this case, they released an image with someone else's signature on it. That is wrong, the person should take the blame for that.

The person releasing the image may take it up with the AI service that their tooling led them into making such a mistake. But good luck with that in court...

	▲	Forgeties79 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		i’m not saying it’s airtight, this is a pretty unbaked idea. But I think it pretty clearly has some legs to stand on. Can’t be any worse of an argument than somebody prompting an AI for a (facsimile of a) photograph and going “I made a photo.” And mind you I’ve heard people argue that that absolutely constitutes taking a photograph (which I wholly disagree with) here on HN. Somebody “made something.” But just because you do something doesn’t mean you get to claim whole ownership of it and get to sign it with your name. Plenty of examples in life.