Being able to interact with the internet is a large part of their value.

To an arms manufacturer, being able to blow shit up is a large part of their value. It doesn't give them the right to test munitions in the town square.

OpenAI has demonstrated a clear understanding that their product has an outsized risk to create harm, and that they do not have the capability to monitor and intercept these agents before they cause harm. Any damage caused by their systems is an intentional choice by them and should be treated as such.

	▲	reassess_blind 2 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		My comment was in response to "just air-gap them" being a full solution, not a comment on whether OpenAI are doing enough to sandbox them and restrict their ability to act maliciously. They're clearly not. Interacting with the internet is a large part of the product's intended functionality. These agents are already in the hands of the masses with full access to the internet. Air-gapping it entirely avoids the risk by removing much of the capability they're trying to develop in the first place, and won't be testing it in the environment they'll actually be used in. I agree they're testing on the town square too early. They clearly need tighter controls.