| ▲ | hypfer 3 hours ago |
| Ah yes, website talks about "the bloat of x11 and Wayland", and doesn't even scroll correctly on Firefox mobile likely due to some JavaScript fuckery. Practice what you preach. And practice first. |
|
| ▲ | seba_dos1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not JavaScript in this case, just CSS bloat (backdrop-filter). |
| |
| ▲ | PhilipRoman an hour ago | parent [-] | | another comment on a different HN thread pointed out a similar issue. Now I'm wondering if backdrop-filter can be used correctly at all or should just be avoided entirely |
|
|
| ▲ | dormo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Scrolling is pretty bad on Firefox desktop as well. So bad that I didn't want to finish the article. Why do people do this? |
| |
| ▲ | Insanity 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What do you mean by "pretty bad"? I'm on Zen (Firefox based) and the scrolling seems to work fine. But maybe it's getting resource constrained on some hardware. | |
| ▲ | prmoustache 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Weird. I can't reproduce the slowness you guys experience with fennec nor ironfox. | |
| ▲ | thereisno 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They only tested in Chrome. | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | black_knight 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I guess the site scrolls smoothly in a TUI browser? |
| |
| ▲ | metalman 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | which, wierdly enough I am useing, and the site scrolls just fine,my browswr has NO java script, No Dom storage, no images/video displayed
though there are a few websites that have some kind of alternate way to display images in short video loops that auto play edit:videos are mp4's |
|
|
| ▲ | orangea 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I don't see any suspicious JS on the page, so I suspect it's a styling issue triggering some inefficiency in Firefox. There are animations and text-shadows. |