A lot of these ‘an agent invented’ or ‘an agent solved’ are actually the agent wading through a lot of info and finding something a human did that no one noticed or saw the relevance of at the time.

If ai becomes so prolific that we humans all stop doing those things then will they still work?

▲

gabbagool an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Which is somewhat ironic since neural networks were "discovered" back in the 1940s... then forgotten... then wait, they were discovered again! ... then forgotten, again... and now here we are.

▲

chris_money202 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well its not just any old human doing these things in a general sense. Its typically academics or highly paid researchers who love doing work like this. So, I don't think it will just one day stop

▲

jonplackett 25 minutes ago | parent [-]

I think access to AI too early (before any expertise) is going to serious cripple educational development.

Next gen of scientists might look quite different.

▲

chris_money202 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

That is probably true, but the ones that make it through to become experts might get super-charged with AI as well

	▲	jonplackett 2 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		But my ponderance is - is that enough. Is AI supercharging or just super finding?

▲

Schiendelman an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, as long as we are advancing to behavior and world models, so that agents can interact with the world themselves. Which we are.

▲

an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]