| ▲ | hangsi a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arguably it is succeeding on this front - LLMs have been much more helpful for learning about mathematics topics than Wikipedia for a while now. Admittedly a somewhat low bar, but they are genuinely helpful. In many other fields the models can still only pull up equal (in my opinion). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | p1necone a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's the 'can answer arbitrary questions' part for me. You could give me the most well crafted, comprehensive document ever and I would still misread bits of it, or miss some crucial bit of information that contextualises the rest or whatever. With LLMs I can ask endless dumb questions in a way that just would not be practical otherwise. The quality of the responses doesn't even have to be particularly good for it to be extremely useful - it's basically a turbo charged rubber duck for learning new concepts. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | munksbeer 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> LLMs have been much more helpful for learning about mathematics topics than Wikipedia for a while now. I can't imagine anyone but someone extremely gifted at first parse understanding learning mathematics from wikipedia. No effort is made to make it understandable for the average reader. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thedreammachine a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agreed. An always-on agent focused solely on improving your knowledge/skills could ask you questions daily, build a picture of the gaps in your understanding and learn where to push you next. I'm experimenting with this at https://miletus.app I'm also curious about training models with that singular goal. If anyone is exploring similar ideas, I'd love to chat. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||