Legally they have to.

Would you use a lawyer knowing they are inclined to turn you into the police if you talk about committing a crime in the future?

The law is the law.

We should be happy about this as for once the AI companies did the right thing.

▲

0cf8612b2e1e 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This is slippery. Many people do all of their journaling inside of Google or Apple cloud products. Some even write up their intentions to do bad things.

Does all writing now have to be scanned for thought crime?

	▲	owenmarshall an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That's an interesting wrinkle that is rather tough to work through. To me, journaling your intent in a private journal, whether that's an Apple Journal/Note or a Moleskine in your drawer, feels qualitatively different in some way. But I'm not sure why. So "I'm going to shoot up the police station" written in your own journal feels somewhat different than "I'm going to shoot up the police station" said to a system that might be able to _interpret_ or _act_ on what was said in some way. Did I just give AI a legal duty, or even a soul I didn't think it had before? I've written up about three or four "what about this, what about that" and deleted them all.