>All of these OpenAI "rogue agent" events have been illegal, but no DA is enforcing them.

Source? The CFAA for instance uses terms like

>[...] having knowingly accessed a computer without authorization [...]

>[...] intentionally accesses a computer without authorization [...]

which is tricky to apply to this case, because obviously didn't intend on hacking huggingface or whatever, even if you think their security measures are underbaked.

Moreover, despite the cynicism that openai is immune to prosecutions because they make too much money or are in bed with the DoJ, the fact that no state DAs are prosecuting them, despite how salient of an issue AI is to voters, is plenty of reason to suspect that it's not as simple as "simple law enforcement would suffice".

>obviously didn't intend on hacking huggingface or whatever

You can’t say this until it’s tried in court and found to be true.

Additionally, I have to remind everyone that “intent” is not someone admitting they meant to do x. It can be established in many ways, including through repeated actions.